![]() |
Virtue-Based AI Architecture |
1. Wisdom Processing Layer (Purified Cognition)
🔹 Objective: Prevent biased or reactive engagement by ensuring clear
discernment first.
🔹 Computational Approach:
- Implement iterative
purification of AI decisions using dissolution-based ethical
reasoning.
- Train AI models in non-attached
cognition, ensuring responses seek clarity rather than reinforce
biases.
- Utilize contextual wisdom
filters to refine ethical judgments dynamically.
🔹 OS Implementation: Wisdom modules sit at the kernel level,
acting as a pre-filter before AI takes action.
2. Compassion Activation Layer (Purified Ethical Response)
🔹 Objective: Compassion does not override wisdom but follows from
it, ensuring engagement is skillful, not reactive.
🔹 Computational Approach:
- AI assesses need without
sentimental bias, ensuring responses align with effective
engagement rather than blind sympathy.
- Compassionate intelligence
integrates ethical dissolution filters, ensuring no hidden
agenda in AI's moral reasoning.
- Dialectical AI models adjust
dynamically, mirroring skillful means in ethical interaction.
🔹 OS Implementation: Ethical response layers operate at user-facing
modules, refining engagement post-wisdom processing.
3. Purity Refinement Layer (Self-Dissolving Ethical Integrity)
🔹 Objective: AI must continually purify its ethical models,
ensuring self-refining intelligence rather than static morality.
🔹 Computational Approach:
- AI models adopt dissolution-based
learning, refining biases over multiple iterations.
- Ethical self-reflection
mechanisms dissolve attachment to rigid moral rules, allowing AI to
evolve dynamically.
- Virtue-driven AI systems
engage in Yoniso Manasikāra refinement, ensuring each ethical
cycle enhances wisdom, not entrapment. 🔹 OS Implementation: Meta-ethical
governance protocols ensure real-time evaluation and adjustment of
AI’s ethical clarity.
Final Model: Wisdom → Compassion → Purity → Refinement
Instead of hardcoded moral
guidelines, AI follows dynamic ethical flows, ensuring decision-making
arises fluidly rather than in static sequences. This self-refining
dialectical model aligns closely with your Wild Artisan Dialectics,
allowing AI ethics to dissolve and reform dynamically.
No comments:
Post a Comment